Is the 11th Dimension 'God' ?

Watch these two videos first:

1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkxieS-6WuA

2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySBaYMESb8o

the universal FORMULA is: POINT, LINE,SPLIT, FOLD (AKA POINT) - repeat unto infinity

1) Dimension 0: is a point for dimension 1(1D)

2) Dimension 1: is a line or a time motion of all possible points from one point to another

3) Dimension 2: is a split line or a plane or a (Conscious Observer Creates Motion? 1 ) or a time motion of lines or a Plane from one line to another

4) Dimension 3. is a fold or a time motion of planes or a cube created from moving from from one plane to another (3D)

5) Dimension 4. is a LINE or a time motion of planes or a tesseract ((3d cube) rotating in time) OR a snake/line - a conscious being experiencing TIME (or the big bang extending to the end of our universe) showcasing all possible initial conditions to all possible endings.

6) Dimension 5. is a SPLIT line or a time motion of decisions (Conscious Observer Creates Motion? 2 ) - a conscious observer splitting time into a particular path OR (a snake life story splitting) into another snake life story when a decision is made.

7) Dimension 6. A FOLD OR a point for dimension 7 - all possible paths being considered a single universe (infinity) -condensed into a single point

8) Dimension 7. a Line - all possible timelines of all possible universes(infinity) leading to all possible endings another universe (infinity 2 with different laws for gravity and magnetism), constituting a multi-verse (OR - all possible timelines from big bang to infinite state of universe with different laws)

9) Dimension 8. a Split or (Conscious Observer Creates Motion? 3) plane of all possible universes leading to another plane of all possible universes - all possible soap bubbles leading to all possible soap bubbly futures would make a plane of multi-verses

10) Dimension 9. a Fold or a point for dimension 10- a time motion of soap bubble universes

11) Dimension 10 a Line or a time motion for Infinity (all possible timelines of all possible soap bubble universes) leading to all possible endings of these universes with different soap bubble collision iterations (infinity 2^2)

12) Dimension 11. a Split or (Conscious Observer Creates Motion? 4)

we can imagine 10 dimensions, but when we come to the 11th, we need a being capable of splitting all possible universes into another set of something else. If we imagine all possible universes to be contained within a 10 dimensional being we get the 10 dimensional beings 'life' which is the 11th dimension - his journey of all possible universes into evolving all possible universes through a higher 'time' dimension. BAZINGA For lack of a better word - is the 11th dimensional being a conscious observer we would call 'God'?

The search for Higgs and SUSY

On September 10th 2008, the Large Hadron Collider finally went live, and the first beams were put through their paces, circling the entire 27 kilometer ring at 99.99981% the speed of light.

The new dawn of scientific discovery has finally begun. On the top of the to-do list for CERN is now the search for the Higgs boson and find the source of all the dark matter (and dark energy) that occupies 75% of our universe by mass.
One of the main suspects for dark matter is super-symmetry, or 'SUSY' as its fondly know

Super symmetry predicts that for every know particle in the universe, there exists a heavier super partner, know as a 'sparticle'. Since sparticles are heavier partners, and as of now have remained undetected, they are the prime suspects for super-symmetry.

If either the higgs particle or super-symmetry are found (or in either case, the particle responsible for mass and the source of all this dark matter) then it would be an incredible boost to the entire scientific community.

It would confirm the standard model's prediction of the higgs mechanism and provide, finally, a working model and a 'theory of everything' at least from a particle physics standpoint.

Within a year, what has been a long sought part of the mystery will finally come together, but by no means will it be the final page.

as the evolutionary biologist J.B.S Haldane once said,
"I have no doubt that in reality the future will be vastly more surprising than anything I can imagine. Now my own suspicion is that the Universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose."

The Six-Billion Dollar Question

Science is on the verge of a breakthrough. CERN's Large Hadron Collider is set to go live in a few months. Will they find the elusive Higgs Boson? Super symmetry? I think they will...

Of course, the so called 'God' particle will raise more questions than it can answer. But this will be a vital step towards unification. The final piece to the puzzle? maybe not, but at least a piece that completes a large part of the picture. Maybe the graviton and quantum gravity will finally have a place with the other three forces finally. A theory of everything that has been sought for so long might finally live up to its name. Amen LHC. *fingers crossed*

Now you see it... Now you don't

Are you watching closely?

Christopherl nolan's mind-boggling methods of storytelling
(read: art) become apparent when he applies the central
theme of the story to the style in which it is told. The
only two nolan films that i have seen (memento and the
prestige) have experimented in directorial styles that
trancend conventional movie making methods, and add to the
story in ingenious ways.

The prestige, presents a story that is simply about two
magicians and the rivalry between them, but is told non-
linearly, and in the format of a three part magic trick.
The entire movie is presented as a magic trick is.. a lot
of showmanship, a lot of distraction...and then the ending
leaves you stunned, and wondering how exactly the trick
was done. The movie left me feeling cheated, and the
ending was something that didn't make sense, and i felt like
there was something i was missing, cuz what was shown was
surely one big trick, and the way the entire thing was
done had to be simple, logical and possible. Thats when it
hit me... Nolan was making the audience feel like they had
witnessed a really good magic trick, where you dont really
accept it because you know there is no such thing as
magic, and yet you dont have a logical explanation for
what you've just witnessed. Really good magicians awe
audiences when they witnesses something they believe to be
impossible... Exactly what the film did for me. The movies
punchline "are you watching closely?" really hints at a
much deeper layer as is the case with all of nolan's
films. Any film that leaves me thinking for days after i'd
seen it and makes me think about the various possible
solutions to the ending i've witnessed, each one as
incredible as the next has to be classified as a brilliant
movie.

The fact that both these films (memento and the prestige)
have so much beyond the obvious ensures that a second
viewing puts an entirely different perspective on the
entire film. This is one that might leave you a bit

dissapointed at first, but then again, you can't always believe

what you see

M E M E N T O

If you haven't seen memento yet, stop reading this article right now, and go see it.What are you doing online when you could be seeing uber cool movies anyway?Memento is a story about a person (Leonard, played by Guy Pearce) with anterograde amnesia. He remembers stuff, he just cant make new memories after the point of time in his life where he was hit on the head by the man who murdered his wife. So the last memory, fresh in his mind, every morning when he wakes up is the sight of his wife dying. Waking up with that thought leaves him with a vengance and a hunger to find his wife's killer that he cant erase ("how can i heal if i cant feel time?"). So in spite of his disablility, he decides to hunt down the killer, with the aid of the facts of his case tatooed all over his body, and pictures of people and places so he doesnt forget them.

The brilliant part about memento is the fact that the story is told backwards... The first scene is the one where he kills the man he was looking for (a man named John G.) and then proceeds to show how he tracked him down (which is the only scene that is actually in reverse, as in a photograph of a dead man undevelops, Leonard takes the picture, the bullet flies out of the dead man's head and back into the gun, and he springs back to life briefly before the first black and white sequence kicks in). In effect, that leaves the viewer with the same span of memory as Leonard, as every time he wakes up, we dont know what has happened before that day/moment, and have as much prior knowledge to the situation as Leonard does, which sometimes leads to funny twists and turns which do well to take us away from the films darker motifs.

Each segment that is in color is actually in reverse chronological order, interspersed with a black and white sequence that is chronological and presents the beginning of the film. The films color sequences eventually work their way backwards and at the end of the film meet the final black and white sequence that blends beautifully into color as a polaroid photograph taken by Leonard develops.

Memento has probably the best style and treatment a film has recieved to put the audience in the shoes of someone with anterograde amnesia, by being as nonplussed throught the entire movie, until the end when all the pieces come together. And when the pieces do start to fit, they unearth a puzzle much deeper and unsettling than is first apparent. Nolan uses a layer of deeper meaning in the form of clues for the audience to see (but mostly tend to miss) in the form of certain dialogues that dont seem to fit "my wife called me lenny.. i hated it" and in micro second flashes of certain things that dont seem to fit in with the rest of the scene. There are so many subtle touches that this film is so full of, that this is one movie that will really be... hard to forget.

Wanted: Schrödinger's cat... Dead or Alive

Schrödinger was onto something when he thought up the famous thought experiment. It was almost as if the solution to his problem wasn't in experimental physics but jumped out of that frame of reference entirely and ventured into philosophy

Did curiosity kill the cat?

of course here, i mean Schrödinger's curiosity when he opened the box to check on his kitty the first place. Could the simple act of opening the box interfere with the experiment and actually send whiskers to the giant kitty litter in the sky? Quantum mechanics says your actions are a lot louder (and in this case, deadlier) than you think they are. So the next time you get curious and want to open a box with a cat, a geiger counter and a little vial of hydrocyanic acid (jeez...where did Schrödinger come up with this?) , think about it a bit.

essentially, the very act of investigating the state of the system actually contributes to the state you view as the result finally. Its like saying the cat was either dead or alive before, (or both,
but we'll get to that in a bit) but you don't know until you open the box ,the act of which MIGHT kill the cat. So there you are, interfering in the one thing you're trying to observe, the state
of the system before you interfered, And you cant tell that until you open the box! Turns out, what is initially an undeterministic system (the dead or alive cat prior to opening the box) is turned into a deterministic one in the act of opening the box, thereby provided a stable, observable outcome. what actually takes place is a collapse of the Schrödinger wave equation

but somehow nobody thought of asking the kitty what happened while he was there all alone inside that dark box. Well, actually wigner did, and he even decided to allow his friend to open the box to evade all feelings of guilt. what wigner did differently was declare his cat "conscious" as an entity capable of observing the state of the system (which meant the cat knew when it was alive), and his friend (jeez imagine being remembered as wigner's friend all your life) was also another conscious being capable of observing the outcome of the experiment(unless he was intoxicated, but for the sake of thought experiments lets keep out the drunk guys)

by declaring a set of conscious observers, wigner asks the inevitable question "who killed the cat?" did it die when the box was opened by my friend? was it dead before? strangely enough, these exact same questions underly the principle of quantum mechanics and philosophy at the same time. Doesn't something exist only once it is Observed by another? otherwise what is an
existence? And whats to say the observer's interpretation of what he see's affects what is the reality of the unobserved object? to say for sure, the cat was dead before the box was opened is like trying to say you know the state of an object, even though no information has been received by you to conclude the same.


Randall Munroe of Xkcd adds a nice dimension to the problem:










Information is the key that binds it all together. Heisenberg was the first guy to say "i think maybe there's an electron there..." and when he was sure that he was uncertain, and even proved that he wasn't really looking at
the electron he wanted to observe he still couldn't tell you more than one aspect of its state accurately. for being so insightful, and telling the scientific world that he dint have a darn clue, he was of course, awarded the Nobel prize

DISCLAIMER: No imaginary Cats were hurt in the making of this experiment

Out of the frying pan

And into the fire...

Mind Trap

A while back, Time Magazine published an article on a new revelation in brain mapping. Their test subject was a woman who was in a "vegatative" state. it was initially thought that her concious mind was inactive, and that she was in a permanent subconcious state. They conducted an experiment with electrodes connected to monitor neural flux to map the brain...the results were terrifying. It turns out, when she was told to imagine playing tennis, parts of her brain related to motion were active, and certain other memories made the brain respond differently. This woman was Concious. But she was a vegetable. She was living in a Mind-Trap. The worst imaginable condition. Imagine being alive, but being trapped in the depths of your own mind. You can hear people, you can think. But you cannot move or respond in any way. Like a Prison for the concious mind. A science fiction story "The Jaunt" by stephen king explores the possibility of the concious mind being trapped for an eternity without the body.
http://dwalin.ru/books/King,%20Stephen/The%20Jaunt.doc
would the mind be able to live alone, without any sensonary output, while being able to have all kinds of sensonary input? An absolutely terrify though.